A Light Hole Puncher: a book review

The light shines in the darkness but the darkness will never overcome it. Sometimes ‘the dark’ is all too apt a description of¬†how we see reality.¬†Systemic injustice, poverty, sickness, death, wars and rumors of war. In Punching Holes in the Dark, Robert Benson relays a story of being asked by friends (in a round of death by sharing) how¬†he was doing on his¬†journey. He was feeling particularly discouraged, both¬†by personal setbacks and big world problems:

The list was, and still is very long‚ÄĒpeople organizing up to make sure some do not have access to health care, prospects of more war to try and clean up the mess from the last ill-advised one, patent ignoring of the fact we are ruining the planet for which the one Who Made Us appointed us as stewards, political maneuvers designed to make sure people not like us have no voice, poverty in the gap between the wealthy and the poor in the largest economy in the world, the widespread notion that more guns is the solution to the killing of one hundred of us each day by someone who can buy as many guns as he likes. The fact the charges into the dark are often led by those who call themselves followers of the Christ was almost more than I could bear. (location 133-139¬†of 969).

Benson was in a dark place and feeling emotionally spent. His friends listened to him, and pointed him away from the dark towards the light of God’s kingdom, already in our midst(location 159).


The¬†title, “Punching Holes in the Dark” came from a close friend of Benson’s father‚ÄĒa seminary friend‚ÄĒwho always signed his letters, “Keep punching holes in the dark, my friend.” Benson uses the phrase to show how we participate in welcoming the kingdom, sometimes in a receptive posture of prayer, and sometimes through action, punching holes in the dark so that the Light of God can break in.

Benson is a warm and accessible writer. He is a contemplative retreat leader, a graduate of the Academy of Spiritual Formation, well schooled in prayer and the spiritual life. He is a sacramental, and liturgy-minded Episcopalian with a long evangelical pedigree. But he does not put on airs, speak in a mystical bubbles, or use technical¬† jargon. His prose is unadorned, and though his life is extraordinary‚ÄĒhe’s the son of a major CCM¬†producer and he has¬†bonfire spiritual guru status‚ÄĒhe tells stories of everyday life: being an introvert, getting into petty arguments, caring for his mother in the throws of dementia, time spent with mentors, praying for¬†others,¬†starting a film club. And yet ordinary life is exactly the place where¬†Christ’s kingdom breaks in, and through quiet acts of prayer, worship, friendship,¬†Benson demonstrates how we can¬†punch holes in the dark (non-violently, of course).

This is the sort of book that one could read through (easily) in one sitting, or slowly and reflectively. The simplicity of Benson’s prose means that some of his stories and phrases grab you later.¬†With first Benson book I ever¬†read (Living Prayer), long after I¬†set it down,¬†Benson’s words continued to work on me, and help me to envision intercessory prayer in a new way. I expect the same sort of dynamic with this one, simple stories and metaphors that continue to work on my insides, and images that are worth cycling back to. I give this book four stars.

Note: I received a galley copy of this book in exchange for my honest review.





The Fulsome Imagination of Lewis: a book review

According to Jerry Root and Mark Neal, Lewis wrote in at least seventeen  literary genres: apologetics, autobiography, educational philosophy, essays, fairy stories, journal, letters, literary criticism, literary history, lyric poetry, narrative poetry, the novel, religious devotion, satire, science fiction, short story, and translation (03). Is there a thread that runs through these each of these genres? Root & Neal say Imagination. In The Surprising Imagination of C.S. Lewis, they provide a taxonomy of the various ways Lewis employs imagination (or warns of its misuse).
9781426795107Lewis’s various genres showcase different aspects of hisimagination. “He wrote in a literary form that helped him best set forth a certain body of idea”(4). Root & Neal divide their exploration of Lewis’ imagination along generic lines, exploring first his non-fiction (autobiography, religious writing and literary criticism) under the heading of “Imagination and the Literature of the Mind.” Part 2, “Imagination and the Literature of the Heart, looks at Lewis’s fiction and poetry. Of course the aspect of imagination described in each of Root and Neal’s chapters may exist in multiple works of Lewis (and genres) but they chose a principle work which highlights what they wanted to say about Lewis’s imagination, and citing other Lewis lit along the way.

Part 1 showcases hoe Lewis employed imagination to orient himself toward reality. His autobiography,¬†Surprised by Joy, reveals a baptized imagination–regenerate and oriented toward the discovery of God (16).¬†Mere Christianity¬†exemplifies Lewis’s use of shared imagination: creativity that connects and communicates with his audience (17, 28).¬†The¬†satisfied imagination¬†‘”delights in the familiar the simple, the mundane, and the repetitive in a manner that brings our minds back to the eternal source of order and repetition”(31).¬†Letters to Malcom Chiefly on Prayer¬†provide the lens for mundane imagining.¬†Lewis’ literary criticism in¬†An Experiment in Criticism¬†and¬†The Discarded Image¬†explore the¬†awakened imagination¬†and the¬†realizing imagination.¬†The awakened imagination is an ‘invitation to break out of the dungeon of self’ and awaken to new ideas (57).¬†In¬†The Discarded Image¬†Lewis described the medieval cosmology and how their worldview determined their vision, and their interpretation of ¬†the past.¬†Lewis exploration helps us¬†evaluate the past and present, and gives us space to question our own assumptions.

In part 2, we see that not all of Lewis’s descriptions of the ¬†imagination are positive. He begins cheerily enough by describing the¬†penetrating imagination¬†of¬†A Horse and His Boy (which employs metaphor to give us a deeper knowledge of a reality), the¬†material imagination¬†of¬†The Voyage of the Dawn Treader¬†and examines the primary imagination¬†in ¬†Out of the Silent Planet¬†(our use of the five senses to understand and interpret the world). But imagination can take a dark turn.¬†That Hideous Strength¬†describes¬†Lewis’s idea of the¬†generous imagination¬†,¬†[the] deificaiton of an idea or thing to the point that borders on adoration or vilification. Simply put it seeks to embellish a thing beyond what it deserves. Its effect is to weaken the self and narrow the soul” (121).¬†The Great Divorce¬†explores the¬†transforming imagination¬†through its characters‚ÄĒa projected, overidealized and inflated expectation of the objects of our affection which leads inevitably to disappointment and disenchantment.¬†The Screwtape Letters¬†take us deeper into the realm of projection (and hell) by showcasing a¬†controlled imagination¬†which projects one’s self-seeking desires on others (155). Root and Neal end on a happier note, showing how Lewis’s poetry provide a lens for the¬†absorbing imagination‚ÄĒa synthesis between old ideas and new consciousness which transcends our own particularity (171). An appendix explores additional use of imagination by C.S. Lewis.

Anyone who has gone through the wardrobe with Lewis, or read his religious writings knows he was a deeply imaginative man with a broad intelligence. Root and Neal do an excellent job of exploring and naming the various ways that Lewis employed imagination. But I don’t like the title. Lewis’ imagination was comprehensive, far-reaching ¬†and full-orbed. But surprising? If you have read Lewis at all, you aren’t all that surprised by Lewis’s imagination and penetrating insights.

But my misgivings about the title (which may not even be Root’s and Neal’s fault), shouldn’t put you off. An exploration of Lewis’s fulsome imagination is worthwhile and Root and Neal summarize ideas and analyze how Lewis employed them. This book will enhance your understanding of Lewis and deepen your appreciation of his writing. Root and Neal make good use of Lewis’ scholarship and shows what one mans imaginings reveal. I give this four-and-a-half stars.

Note: I received this book from the publisher through Handlebar Media in exchange for my honest review.